The Paper and Print Buyers' Coach |
|||||||
Paper – Back to BasicsPaper represents more than 30 percent of production costs at many catalog companies. Therefore production directors should have a well-defined strategy for purchasing this essential component of print catalogs. With the continuing firm paper market and high level of supplier consolidation being announced, your paper purchasing should not be left to chance. Let’s assume you have already selected the grades and basis weights of paper desired. The following will outline a broad framework of issues that need to be addressed in the formation of a custom paper strategy. This strategy can assure long- term quality supply, and lead you to competitive prices, even throughout the ups and downs inherent to the paper market. The three basic paper purchasing models are:
The decision of which model is appropriate for your catalog operation depends on tonnage volume, whether you have in-house expertise, and a variety of financial and administrative issues. Once your requirements grow beyond approximately 3,000 tons, you should consider either the publisher-purchased or publisher-specified route. Then you’ll need to decide which sales channel to buy through:
Many large catalogers prefer to deal direct, while many more modest-sized catalogers like the purchasing assistance provided by the merchant or broker. Some mills prefer to distribute their products through merchant channels, while other mills pursue the direct selling approach. In some cases, a production director can do well by blending both approaches. In developing your strategy, keep in mind two essential procurement themes that have consistently been keys to success for others:
Allocating Paper SourcesA representative supply sourcing model that can be adapted to a variety of catalog producers might show an allocation of annual requirements roughly as follows:
While the percentages are only approximate, this type of approach can give you the supply assurance linked to a multi-year contract with Supplier A, combined with the backup and competitive challenges provided by Supplier B. Keeping 15 percent of your requirements unallocated or uncommitted gives you freedom to make some spot purchases in a soft market, or to allow Supplier A the incentive to grow to as much as 75 percent of your allocation, while Supplier B can compete for up to 40 percent. With the broad framework outlined above, the catalog production director can approach the candidate suppliers either informally or through a more formal request for proposal (RFP). Ultimately, supplier selection should be based on these fundamental criteria: capability, quality, service, net price, and relationships. The strategy formation process can have significant rewards. In addition to the obvious peace of mind you’ll get from knowing you have a solid supply plan in place, the potential for significant cost savings is obvious. Even a 2 percent or 3 percent savings on paper can generate huge bottom-line benefits to your catalog’s success. Learn MoreReturn to our articles page or simply contact us to find out how paper and print strategic consulting can improve the profits for your business. Copyright © 2007 - All Rights Reserved |
|||||||
Website by Crystal Point Consulting